Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 vs lightroom

It's much faster to pick and rate and work with collections, faster to use and filter keywords and other metadata, easier to watermark images. In Lightroom, the features in Camera Raw and Bridge are more integrated and with some keyboard shortcuts that Bridge simply doesn't have. But if you work on high volumes of raw files, Lightroom is more efficient. If you tend to work on a few images at a time in great detail at a pixel level, Photoshop is your program when you need to edit raws or sync settings you've got Camera Raw and Bridge. So the features to support that workflow are integrated in one place. Lightroom was designed for today's workflows, where hundreds of images in raw format can flood in from a camera card in one session and you might handle thousands in a year, where metadata is important, and where there are typically multiple outputs: web/social media, print, and video.

Camera Raw and Bridge are literally afterthoughts to that history, coded much later and completely separate programs than Photoshop. Photoshop originated many years ago designed for editing individual images in an era when images came as RGB or CMYK files from scanners, when you handled maybe tens of images at a time, and when there was one final output: print. But the difference between Lightroom and Photoshop is not about comparining the lists of features. It's true that with Bridge and Camera Raw you can do almost anything you can do with Lightroom. You may not need to be convinced Photoshop might be what you need.

Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 vs lightroom